Improving coronary calcium scoring with deep learning image conversion in low-dose chest CT

Improving coronary calcium scoring with deep learning image conversion in low-dose chest CT

Product: AVIEW LCS+ Company: Coreline Soft


Impact of Deep Learning-Based Image Conversion on Fully Automated Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Thin-Slice, Sharp-Kernel, Non-Gated, Low-Dose Chest CT Scans: A Multi-Center Study

Korean Journal of Radiology, 2025

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of deep learning-based image conversion on the accuracy of automated coronary artery calcium quantification using thin-slice, sharp-kernel, non-gated, low-dose chest computed tomography (LDCT) images collected from multiple institutions.

Materials and Methods

A total of 225 pairs of LDCT and calcium scoring CT (CSCT) images scanned at 120 kVp and acquired from the same patient within a 6-month interval were retrospectively collected from four institutions. Image conversion was performed for LDCT images using proprietary software programs to simulate conventional CSCT. This process included 1) deep learning-based kernel conversion of low-dose, high-frequency, sharp kernels to simulate standard-dose, low-frequency kernels, and 2) thickness conversion using the raysum method to convert 1-mm or 1.25-mm thickness images to 3-mm thickness. Automated Agaston scoring was conducted on the LDCT scans before (LDCT-Orgauto) and after the image conversion (LDCT-CONVauto). Manual scoring was performed on the CSCT images (CSCTmanual) and used as a reference standard. The accuracy of automated Agaston scores and risk severity categorization based on the automated scoring on LDCT scans was analyzed compared to the reference standard, using the Bland–Altman analysis, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and weighted kappa (κ) statistic.

Results

LDCT-CONVauto demonstrated a reduced bias for Agaston score, compared with CSCTmanual, than LDCT-Orgauto did (-3.45 vs. 206.7). LDCT-CONVauto showed a higher CCC than LDCT-Orgauto did (0.881 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.750–0.960] vs. 0.269 [95% CI, 0.129–0.430]). In terms of risk category assignment, LDCT-Orgauto exhibited poor agreement with CSCTmanual (weighted κ = 0.115 [95% CI, 0.082–0.154]), whereas LDCT-CONVauto achieved good agreement (weighted κ = 0.792 [95% CI, 0.731–0.847]).

Conclusion

Deep learning-based conversion of LDCT images originally obtained with thin slices and a sharp kernel can enhance the accuracy of automated coronary artery calcium score measurement using the images.

Read full study